Two posts on the first day!! This may not happen that often but I do feel the need(want?) to comment on the Hockey Canada decision (across provinces) to ban checking at the Peewee level (12-13 year olds) and below (http://www.tsn.ca/canadian_hockey/story/?id=423976). As a former player of minor hockey and a coach of high school hockey in addition to an avid observer of parents at youth hockey games, I am in complete favour of this decision and here is my reasoning...
Aside from the obvious risk of injury to young players, many of whom can differ in height by as much as a foot (not to mention the weight differential!), I believe that many of the problems we see in the stands are partially attributable to checking. The natural aggressive nature of the game of hockey can often lead to increased levels of anxiety/adrenaline by both player and parent alike. Add in the impact of a solid body check sending another player to the ice or banging into the boards, and I believe you have a recipe for heightened aggression - both on the part of players and parents. How many times have I heard parents yell to their own kids to "Nail em!" and "Drive em into the boards!"? With increased body contact and aggression comes increased anxiety and with increased anxiety comes the innate need (want?) to be the victor of that aggression. Before you know it you have parents yelling at coaches, yelling at referees, yelling at each other, yelling at the kids.... yelling at their own kids. So sad!!
While neither of my boys play hockey (despite the fact that I played and loved the game myself), I have observed that for the most part, the parent behaviour at MOST soccer games is considerably less aggressive. The game (for the most part) gets played in a sportsmanlike manner and the parents (for the most part) are well behaved. I have also observed that when parents do get somewhat mouthy, they tend to often be parents of kids who - you guessed it - play hockey!!
So is banning checking in Peewee and below.... good decision? Will it solve all of the "ills" of the 'great Canadian game'? Probably not... but it might be a good place to start!